News – USA – The Supreme Court won’t stop the grand jury from receiving Trump’s tax returns


The US. The Supreme Court declined Monday to prevent a grand jury in New York from receiving President Donald Trump’s personal tax and corporate tax returns This was a crucial defeat in his protracted legal battle over not placing his tax records in the hands of investigators

The verdict doesn’t mean the returns will be released anytime soon and may never be publicly released.Under state law, materials that are turned over to a grand jury must be kept secret, but Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance can now get from Trump’s accountants Demand that they hand over the record the President steadfastly refused to surrender to prosecutors or Congress

Vance is filing an eight-year tax return for a grand jury investigation into hush money payments and other financial transactions The investigation began after it became known that former Trump attorney Michael Cohen had Stormy Daniels 130Paid $ 000 to keep silent about her claim she had an affair with Trump, a claim the former president has denied

Cohen also alleged to Congress that the Trump Organization sometimes lied about its financial situation in order to evade taxes or obtain favorable loan terms

In July, the Supreme Court dismissed Trump’s allegation that, as the seated president, he was immune to any part of the criminal justice system – including investigations by the grand jury, the ruling, however, said he would return to the lower courts and anyone who attempts a subpoena to defeat could provide the same arguments

A month later, a federal judge in New York ruled Trump’s renewed efforts to dismiss the subpoena, describing the legal attack as merely a repackaged version of his original immunity argument The 2 US. The appeals court upheld the judgment

Trump’s legal team said the subpoena was too broad and maliciously issued to harass him. If Vance were just considering Cohen’s payments, that wouldn’t explain why Vance was simply issuing a much broader subpoena copied from a congressional committee

A state’s first subpoena for a sitting president’s records should have been properly tailored, they informed the Supreme Court

“The nearly unlimited range, range and geographic reach has all the hallmarks of a fishing expedition,” his attorneys told the Supreme Court, “and the fact that the subpoena was issued to a third party administrator amid tensions between the Trump Organization and the District Attorney were high, and this for dubious reasons of efficiency, only makes the allegation of malice all the more plausible “

However, in recent court records, Vance has suggested that the scope of his work may be broader than just the hush money payments

“The investigation covers a wide variety of business transactions and is based on information obtained from public sources, confidential whistleblowers, and grand jury proceedings,” and could include business document forgery, insurance fraud, and tax fraud, Vance told the appeals court

After the Supreme Court cleared the way for Vance to enforce the subpoena, the president has exhausted his legal options to block it.The full tax return documents, or parts of them, would only be released if Vance later files and attempts criminal charges to introduce this as evidence

Pete Williams is an NBC News correspondent covering the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court in Washington

Donald Trump, United States Supreme Court

News – USA – The Supreme Court will not prevent the grand jury from receiving Trump’s tax returns